Issue Progress Tracking
Auto-updates GitHub issues with commit progress. Use when starting work on an issue, tracking progress during implementation, or completing work with a PR.
Issue Progress Tracking
Ceremony guide for tracking GitHub issue progress via gh CLI. Ensures issues stay updated as work progresses from start to PR.
Quick Start
/ork:issue-progress-tracking 123Phase 1: Start Work
Label the issue and create a feature branch:
# Move issue to in-progress
gh issue edit $ARGUMENTS --add-label "status:in-progress" --remove-label "status:todo"
gh issue comment $ARGUMENTS --body "Starting work on this issue."
# Create feature branch
git checkout -b issue/$ARGUMENTS-brief-descriptionRules:
- Always branch from the default branch (main/dev)
- Branch name format:
issue/<number>-<brief-description> - Never work directly on main/dev
Phase 2: During Work — Small Commits
Commit after each logical step, not at the end. Every commit references the issue:
# Each commit references the issue number
git commit -m "feat(#$ARGUMENTS): add user model
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"Rules:
- One logical change per commit (atomic)
- Reference issue in every commit:
type(#N): description - Commit early and often — don't accumulate a massive diff
Phase 3: Report Progress (Long Implementations)
For multi-step work, post progress updates:
gh issue comment $ARGUMENTS --body "Progress update:
- Completed: database schema, API endpoints
- In progress: frontend components
- Remaining: tests, documentation"When to post updates:
- After completing a major milestone
- When blocked or changing approach
- Before stepping away from a long task
Phase 4: Complete Work
Create the PR and update labels:
# Create PR that closes the issue
gh pr create \
--title "feat(#$ARGUMENTS): brief description" \
--body "Closes #$ARGUMENTS
## Changes
- Change 1
- Change 2
## Test Plan
- [ ] Unit tests pass
- [ ] Manual verification"
# Update issue status
gh issue edit $ARGUMENTS --add-label "status:in-review" --remove-label "status:in-progress"Rules Quick Reference
| Rule | Impact | What It Covers |
|---|---|---|
| Start Work Ceremony | HIGH | Branch creation, label updates, initial comment |
| Small Commits | HIGH | Atomic commits referencing issues |
Total: 2 rules across 2 categories
Key Decisions
| Decision | Choice | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Label prefix | status: | Consistent with GitHub conventions |
| Branch format | issue/<N>-desc | Links branch to issue automatically |
| Commit reference | type(#N): | Conventional commits + issue linking |
| Progress comments | Manual | Keeps humans in the loop |
Common Mistakes
- Starting work without labeling — team loses visibility into who is working on what
- Giant commits at the end — makes review harder and history useless for bisect
- Forgetting to link PR to issue — issue stays open after merge
- Not updating labels on PR creation — issue shows "in-progress" during review
- Closing issues manually with
gh issue close— issues are closed ONLY by merging a PR withCloses #Nin the body. During work, comment progress withgh issue comment; never close directly.
Related Skills
ork:commit— Commit with conventional formatork:fix-issue— Full issue resolution workflowork:implement— Feature implementation with parallel agentsork:create-pr— Create pull requests
Rules (2)
Make small commits with issue references to maintain traceability and enable bisect — HIGH
Small Commits with Issue References
Commit after each logical step. Every commit references the issue number.
Incorrect:
# One giant commit at the end
git add .
git commit -m "implement feature"Correct:
# Commit after each logical step
git commit -m "feat(#123): add user model and migration"
git commit -m "feat(#123): add authentication endpoint"
git commit -m "test(#123): add auth endpoint tests"Key rules:
- One logical change per commit (schema, endpoint, tests = separate commits)
- Always include
#Nin the commit message to link to the issue - Use conventional commit format:
type(#N): description - Commit before switching context — don't lose work in unstaged changes
- If a commit touches more than 3 files in different domains, it is probably too large
Run the start-work ceremony to establish branch traceability and team visibility — HIGH
Start Work Ceremony
Before writing any code, signal intent and create an isolated branch.
Incorrect:
# Jump straight into coding on main
git checkout main
# ... make changes ...
git commit -m "fix stuff"Correct:
# 1. Update issue status
gh issue edit 123 --add-label "status:in-progress" --remove-label "status:todo"
# 2. Comment your intent
gh issue comment 123 --body "Starting work on this issue."
# 3. Branch from default branch
git checkout main && git pull origin main
git checkout -b issue/123-add-user-authKey rules:
- Always pull latest default branch before branching
- Branch name format:
issue/<number>-<brief-kebab-description> - Label the issue before starting work — prevents duplicate effort
- Comment briefly what approach you plan to take
Implement
Full-power feature implementation with parallel subagents. Use when implementing, building, or creating features.
Langgraph
LangGraph workflow patterns for state management, routing, parallel execution, supervisor-worker, tool calling, checkpointing, human-in-loop, streaming, subgraphs, and functional API. Use when building LangGraph pipelines, multi-agent systems, or AI workflows.
Last updated on