Competitive Analysis
Porter's Five Forces, SWOT analysis, and competitive landscape mapping. Use when analyzing market position, evaluating competitive threats, building battlecards, or assessing industry dynamics.
Primary Agent: product-strategist
Competitive Analysis
Frameworks for analyzing competitive position and industry dynamics.
When to Use Porter's vs. SWOT
| Framework | Use When |
|---|---|
| Porter's Five Forces | Evaluating industry attractiveness; new market entry; strategic positioning |
| SWOT | Internal capability assessment; go/no-go decisions; strategy planning |
| Competitive Landscape Map | Visualizing whitespace; investor decks; positioning against specific competitors |
| Competitor Profiles | Battlecards for sales; feature gap analysis; threat assessment |
Use Porter's to understand the structural forces shaping the industry. Use SWOT to assess your specific position within it. Combine both for a complete picture.
Porter's Five Forces Template
## Porter's Five Forces: [Industry/Market]
### 1. Competitive Rivalry — Intensity: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Factor | Assessment |
|--------|------------|
| Number of competitors | |
| Industry growth rate | |
| Product differentiation | |
| Exit barriers | |
### 2. Threat of New Entrants — Threat Level: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Barrier | Strength |
|---------|----------|
| Economies of scale | |
| Brand loyalty | |
| Capital requirements | |
| Network effects | |
| Switching costs | |
### 3. Bargaining Power of Suppliers — Power: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Key suppliers, switching cost, concentration]
### 4. Bargaining Power of Buyers — Power: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Price sensitivity, alternatives available, buyer concentration]
### 5. Threat of Substitutes — Threat: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Alternative ways customers solve the same problem]
### Overall Industry Attractiveness: X/10
[Summary: which forces are most significant and why]SWOT Analysis
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
| (Internal +) | (Internal -) |
| * What we do well | * Where we lack |
| * Unique resources | * Resource gaps |
| * Competitive advantages| * Capability limits |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| OPPORTUNITIES | THREATS |
| (External +) | (External -) |
| * Market trends | * Competitive pressure |
| * Unmet needs | * Regulatory changes |
| * Technology shifts | * Economic factors |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+TOWS Matrix (SWOT to Strategy)
| Strengths | Weaknesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunities | SO: Use strengths to capture opportunities | WO: Fix weaknesses to unlock opportunities |
| Threats | ST: Use strengths to mitigate threats | WT: Minimize weaknesses, avoid threats |
Competitor Profile Template
## Competitor: [Name]
### Overview
- Founded: [Year] | Funding: $[Amount] | Employees: [N]
- Target customer: [Segment]
- Pricing: [Model and range]
### Strengths / Weaknesses
+ [Strength 1]
+ [Strength 2]
- [Weakness 1]
- [Weakness 2]
### Threat Assessment: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
- [Why this threat level]
- [Our differentiation vs. this competitor]Competitive Landscape Map
Plot competitors on two axes that matter most to buyers (e.g., price vs. features, ease of use vs. power):
HIGH PRICE
|
Premium Leaders | Luxury Niche
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp A] | | | [Comp B] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
|
LOW ────────────────────+──────────────────── HIGH
FEATURES | FEATURES
|
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp C] | | | [US] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
Budget Options | Value Leaders
|
LOW PRICEIdentify whitespace — quadrants with no incumbents that align with unmet buyer needs.
GitHub Signals for Competitive Tracking
# Star count and momentum
gh api repos/owner/repo --jq '{stars: .stargazers_count, forks: .forks_count}'
# Shipping velocity (recent releases)
gh release list --repo owner/repo --limit 5
# Community size
gh api repos/owner/repo/contributors --jq 'length'| Signal | Check Frequency |
|---|---|
| Star growth | Weekly |
| Release notes | Per release |
| Pricing changes | Monthly |
| Feature launches | Per announcement |
| Full analysis | Quarterly |
References
- Competitive Analysis Rules — Porter's, SWOT, landscape map, competitor profile templates
- Competitive Analysis Guide — Research methodology, data sources, update cadence
Related Skills
ork:market-sizing— Quantify opportunity size alongside competitive landscapeork:business-case— Build financial justification informed by competitive positionork:product-frameworks— Full product strategy toolkit (value prop, prioritization, OKRs)
Version: 1.0.0
Rules (1)
Analyze competitive landscape using Porter Five Forces, SWOT, and positioning maps — HIGH
Competitive Analysis
Frameworks for analyzing competition and understanding industry dynamics.
Porter's Five Forces
+---------------------+
| Threat of New |
| Entrants |
| (Barrier height) |
+---------+-----------+
|
v
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
| Bargaining | | Competitive | | Bargaining |
| Power of |<---| Rivalry |--->| Power of |
| Suppliers | | (Intensity) | | Buyers |
+-----------------+ +---------+-------+ +-----------------+
|
v
+---------------------+
| Threat of |
| Substitutes |
| (Alternative ways) |
+---------------------+Force Analysis Template
## Porter's Five Forces: [Industry]
### 1. Competitive Rivalry -- Intensity: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Factor | Assessment |
|--------|------------|
| Number of competitors | |
| Industry growth rate | |
| Product differentiation | |
| Exit barriers | |
### 2. Threat of New Entrants -- Threat Level: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Barrier | Strength |
|---------|----------|
| Economies of scale | |
| Brand loyalty | |
| Capital requirements | |
| Network effects | |
### 3-5. [Supplier power, Buyer power, Substitutes]
[Same structure]
### Overall Industry Attractiveness: X/10SWOT Analysis
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
| (Internal +) | (Internal -) |
| * What we do well | * Where we lack |
| * Unique resources | * Resource gaps |
| * Competitive advantages| * Capability limits |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| OPPORTUNITIES | THREATS |
| (External +) | (External -) |
| * Market trends | * Competitive pressure |
| * Unmet needs | * Regulatory changes |
| * Technology shifts | * Economic factors |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+SWOT to Strategy (TOWS Matrix)
| Strengths | Weaknesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunities | SO Strategies: Use strengths to capture opportunities | WO Strategies: Overcome weaknesses to capture opportunities |
| Threats | ST Strategies: Use strengths to mitigate threats | WT Strategies: Minimize weaknesses and avoid threats |
Competitive Landscape Map
HIGH PRICE
|
Premium | Luxury
Leaders | Niche
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp A] | | | [Comp B] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
|
LOW --------------------+-------------------- HIGH
FEATURES | FEATURES
|
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp C] | | | [US] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
Budget | Value
Options | Leaders
|
LOW PRICECompetitor Profile Template
## Competitor: [Name]
### Overview
- **Founded:** [Year]
- **Funding:** $[Amount]
- **Employees:** [N]
### Product
- **Core offering:** [Description]
- **Key features:** [List]
- **Pricing:** [Model]
- **Target customer:** [Segment]
### Strengths / Weaknesses
1. [Strength/Weakness]
2. [Strength/Weakness]
### Threat Assessment: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOWGitHub Signals to Track
# Star count and growth
gh api repos/owner/repo --jq '{stars: .stargazers_count}'
# Recent releases (shipping velocity)
gh release list --repo owner/repo --limit 5
# Contributor count
gh api repos/owner/repo/contributors --jq 'length'Update Frequency
| Signal | Check Frequency |
|---|---|
| Star growth | Weekly |
| Release notes | Per release |
| Pricing changes | Monthly |
| Feature launches | Per announcement |
| Full analysis | Quarterly |
Incorrect — Vague competitive assessment:
## Competitors
- Company A: Big player, lots of features
- Company B: Cheaper option
- Company C: New entrantCorrect — Structured competitive analysis with SWOT:
## Competitor: Company A
### Strengths / Weaknesses
+ Established brand, 60% market share
+ Enterprise features (SSO, RBAC)
- Legacy UI, poor mobile experience
- Slow release cycle (quarterly)
### Threat Assessment: HIGH
- Direct competitor in enterprise segment
- Strong sales team, existing relationships
### Our Differentiation
- Modern UX, mobile-first
- Weekly releases, faster iterationReferences (1)
Competitive Analysis Guide
Competitive Analysis Guide
Framework for systematic competitor research.
Competitor Categories
DIRECT COMPETITORS
└── Same problem, same solution approach
└── Example: Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
INDIRECT COMPETITORS
└── Same problem, different solution
└── Example: AI coding vs traditional IDE plugins
POTENTIAL COMPETITORS
└── Adjacent players who could enter
└── Example: Cloud providers adding AI toolsCompetitive Analysis Framework
1. Identify Competitors
# GitHub search for similar projects
gh search repos "langgraph workflow" --sort stars --limit 10
# Check related topics
gh api search/repositories?q=topic:ai-agents --jq '.items[].full_name'2. Build Competitor Profiles
## Competitor: [Name]
### Overview
- Founded: [Year]
- Funding: $[Amount]
- Team size: [N]
- Headquarters: [Location]
### Product
- Core offering: [Description]
- Target segment: [Who they serve]
- Pricing: [Model and range]
- Technology: [Key tech stack]
### Positioning
- Value proposition: [Their pitch]
- Key differentiators: [What they claim]
- Messaging: [How they talk about themselves]
### Strengths
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]
### Weaknesses
- [Weakness 1]
- [Weakness 2]
### Market Presence
- GitHub stars: [N]
- Monthly growth: [%]
- Community activity: [Active/Moderate/Low]3. Feature Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core capability 1 | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Core capability 2 | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ |
| Integration X | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Pricing (entry) | $X | $Y | $Z | $W |
| Open source | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
4. Positioning Map
EASE OF USE
│
┌────────────┼────────────┐
│ Us │ [B] │
HIGH ──────┼────────────┼────────────┼────── LOW
POWER │ │ │ POWER
│ [A] │ [C] │
└────────────┼────────────┘
│
COMPLEXITY5. SWOT Analysis
HELPFUL HARMFUL
┌─────────────┬─────────────┐
INTERNAL │ STRENGTHS │ WEAKNESSES │
│ • Our tech │ • Resources │
│ • Our team │ • Gaps │
├─────────────┼─────────────┤
EXTERNAL │ OPPORTUN. │ THREATS │
│ • Market │ • [Comp A] │
│ • Trends │ • Risks │
└─────────────┴─────────────┘GitHub Signals to Track
# Star count and growth
gh api repos/owner/repo --jq '{stars: .stargazers_count}'
# Issue activity (community engagement)
gh api repos/owner/repo --jq '{open_issues: .open_issues_count}'
# Recent releases (shipping velocity)
gh release list --repo owner/repo --limit 5
# Contributor count
gh api repos/owner/repo/contributors --jq 'length'Update Frequency
| Signal | Check Frequency |
|---|---|
| Star growth | Weekly |
| Release notes | Per release |
| Pricing changes | Monthly |
| Feature launches | Per announcement |
| Full analysis | Quarterly |
Commit
Creates commits with conventional format and validation. Use when committing changes or generating commit messages.
Configure
Configures OrchestKit plugin settings, MCP servers, hook permissions, and keybindings. Use when customizing plugin behavior or managing settings.
Last updated on